Saturday 4 February 2017

Current, but common, issues in my professional context.

Our school is about 98 years old but it’s still growing and changing. In my opinion, our school is in its midlife development period (Stein (1985), cited in Stoll, 1998, p.9). I have experienced change from the time I started, with the principal, having started just a year ahead of me, being new as well. Nine years later, the latest changes include shifting into our new purpose built ILE, as well as adapting to a new principal with all the changes/improvements he plans to facilitate.

We were not impressed with the narrow focus on Reading, Writing and Mathematics created by National Standards. In spite of this, we still focus on educating the whole child. We teach an integrated curriculum to contextualize our teaching. Our children, climb trees (in spite of the latest Health and Safety Rules), play sport, music, act in plays, ride bikes and ramps at school and are exposed to activities to develop their maturity and confidence.

A handful of parents has their own ideas on what should be taught in schools. To remedy this, we try various ways to keep parents informed of what happens in the classroom. A few years ago, I had the opportunity to explain to a parent why we do maths the way we do when he sat in on a lesson I modeled for parents on one of the Parent and Grandparent days we hosted. We also started using blogs, which was not as successful. Our latest strategy is using Yammer, a social media website where we hope to build on our sense of community.

We are also competing with intermediate schools to keep our year 6 students with us until year 8. This is an ongoing process which is reviewed regularly. Making use of specialist teachers in Science, Music, Art and PE, appropriate use of ICT and providing a caring environment is a strength. We are lucky to have a special group of Year 7 & 8 teachers. The culture of care and emotional displays are common, especially at Year 8 Final Assemblies. According to Stoll, 1998, this sense of family is typical of Primary Schools (P.10).

A small number of parents have also taken their children elsewhere in anticipation of us moving into our ILE’s this year. We’ve managed this process by keeping the parents informed through parent meetings and inviting them into our classrooms, by acknowledging their concerns and through our commitment to keep their children safe. We have also shared the research and motivation for the change through community meetings and through daily contact with parents. The message was: We are also scared, but it is the right way to go and we are up for the challenge!

We are also competing with intermediate schools to keep our year 6 students with us until year 8. This is an ongoing process which is reviewed regularly. Making use of specialist teachers in Science, Music, Art and PE, appropriate use of ICT and providing a caring environment is a strength. We are lucky to have a special group of Year 7 & 8 teachers. The culture of care and emotional displays are common, especially at Year 8 Final Assemblies. According to Stoll, 1998, this sense of family is typical of Primary Schools (P.10).

Most of the norms listed in Stoll and Finch’s list, such as shared goals and responsibility for success, are embedded in our school. We are a happy, supportive group but most of us still find robust reviews and critique difficult and are perhaps not as open as we could be. Therefore, with reference to Judith Warren Little (1990), cited in Stoll, 1998, who states that collegiality creates greater readiness for reviews and critiques, we have room for improvement to be truly collegial.

Reference:
Stoll. (1998). School Culture. School Improvement Network’s Bulletin 9. Institute of Education, University of London. Retrieved from http://www.educationalleaders.govt.nz/Culture/Understanding-school-cultures/School-Culture

4 comments:

  1. Hey Joseph, we also have moved into our new ILE this year and are finding that the lack of information / consultation with our community 'during the build' has resulted in many parents questioning what it is all about. We are in the process of planning a 'sharing' evening where WE can share the kaupapa of this new pedagogy / space. We are also going to have our learners show their whanau how to access their learning online. Look forward to following your journey in 2-17.
    Kerri

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, Kerri. Thank you for commenting. We are actually back in our old classrooms as the new build wasn't completed by start of term. We had to move most of our resources back and set up our rooms in 1 1/2 days. Credit to our incredible staff who took all of this in their stride. We've replicated the spaces we've planned for the new build over three classrooms. Our biggest focus at the moment, is to make sure we know the children and that they get to know us. A few children - quiet ones - are finding it hard to adjust to having four teachers. Our parents were, and some still are, understandably quite apprehensive about the new approach, wondering if it is the best thing for their children. To keep parents in the loop, we started to use a social media platform called Yammer. We're finding this to be a convenient, easy to use way to share what's happening inside our rooms. Cheers. Will now find your blog.

      Delete
  2. I think you are right in the value of full primaries. I have taught full primaries, intermediates and now a middle school. The down side of intermediates is they are only there for two years and miss out on that community of primary and middle schools. As you say to have"specialists" teachers at a full primary you just have to use the strengths of the teachers already there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for commenting, Raewyn. Teachers do bring different strengths to the table and, when you have the right conditions, can complement each other very well. As you know.

      Delete